Economics of Climate Change: Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Measures for Climate Change

Until now, no systematic cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken for climate change adaptation measures in Germany. This study helps to fill this knowledge gap and provide insights about remaining risks and informational needs. The project developed an assessment framework that goes beyond basic cost-benefit analyses and applied this to 28 different adaptation measures. The study showed that the methodology was applicable in practice and also expanded and consolidated the empirical basis for the economic assessment of adaptation measures. The results give an impression of how useful economic analysis for the assessment, prioritization, and selection of adaptation measures can be.
During the first phase of the project the current state of knowledge is gathered, processed and unified. The second phase deals with the closing of knowledge gaps and the development of the information base. The focus is on developing a methodology that allows a standardized evaluation of adaptation measures. Thus criteria for comparing different adaptation measures will be developed and the (economic) information base, especially on costs and benefits of adaptation measures will be standardized.
The results of the project are a literature review and a final report in which 28 concrete adaptation measures have been analyzed.
No climate scenario has been developed (the emissions scenarios and climate change from 4th AR, IPCC 2007 have been used)
The expected impacts of climate change are listed separately in the final report depending on the field of action of the specific adaptation measure.
For each of the analyzed adaptation measures the relevance and temporal urgency have been assessed. This clearly demonstrated that caused by their special relevance, their temporal characteristics and no-regrets characters, some measures are rather recommend for an early implementation, such as renaturation measures, soil conserving management, heat warning system, or the civil protection measures.
In order to find suitable adaptation measures for the assessment, the adaptation measures gained from the literature study were examined for their suitability for further analysis in a first step. The main problem is that there are no satisfying data for the majority of possible adaptation measures in Germany until now (missing workable valuation methods or fragmentary data). In order to make a meaningful assessment nevertheless, the limitation was therefore done using selected criteria.
The following adaptation measures have been analyzed in the different fields of action:
For each of the considered adaptation measure, the interactions will be assessed and analysed to what extent the measures involved may have a beneficial or adverse influence on each other. The effects between adaptation measures will be evaluated and aggregated by a matrix. By considering such synergies and links but also overlaps and conflicts, measures bundle can be identified which are mutually dependent or act on different areas of activity simultaneously.
As a first step the costs and benefits of selected adaptation measures are detected at the individual measure level. The emphasis is on measures of the public respectively the private-public sector. Since costs and benefits often take place at different times, the timing of costs and benefits and the issue of discounting need to be considered.
The cost analysis is based on an investment appraisal. The economic costs of the action will be estimated quantitatively and qualitatively: one-time investment costs, running costs and transaction costs. In addition, other cost components are taken into account:
In a second step the cost and benefit considerations will be standardised, in order to compare key criteria. The comparison will show either the total cost and the overall benefit (as a net present value for the whole life- and effective duration of a measure), or the derived average cost per year of the life- and effective duration of a measure (annuities).
German Environment Agency (UBA)
Ecologic Institute, Berlin
INFRAS, Zürich; ISI – Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe
Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH
Pfalzburger Straße 43/44
10717 Berlin