KLIMWALD – Successful Climate Adaptation in the Communal Forests

Background and Goals

Climate Change threatens to overstrain the adaptability of the ecosystem and thereby impair the forest functions essential to society. In order to secure the future viability of the forests, a central challenge lies in handling forestry practice with future climatic changes and the consequences to be derived for long-term silvicultural decisions. In addition, effective wildlife management is a critical success factor.

In the project KLIMWALD, the partners from forestry practice and science specify solutions for climate-adapted silviculture in the municipalities of Calden, Naumburg, Wolfhagen and Zierenberg. In close cooperation with local stakeholders, an integrated management concept for wildlife will be created. This is based on the requirements of a climate-adapted forest. The aim of the BMUB-funded lighthouse project is to create sustainable and transferable concepts that contribute substantially to climate adaptation in the forest. 

Content time

to

Research area/region

Country
  • Germany
Region of implementation (all German federal states)
  • Hesse
Spatial resolution 

Region North of Hesse

Steps in the process of adaptation to climate change

Step 1: Understand and describe climate change

Approach and results 

Object of investigation:

  • Silvicultural concept for climate adaptation in forests of the participating municipalities
  • Wildlife management

The expected changes in temperature and precipitation distribution vary regionally. As part of the KLIMWALD project, projected climate changes for the period 2041-2070 were projected for the project area in northern Hesse. The scenario RCP8.5 was used for this. This assumes that fossil energy continues to be used unrestrainedly and no effective technology for airborne CO2 fixation is used.

Parameter (climate signals)
  • Heat waves
  • Flash floods
  • Altered rainfall patterns
  • Higher average temperatures
  • Storm
  • Dry periods
Further times 

 

  • Reference period 1961-1990
  • 1987-2016
  • 1991-2050
  • Projections for 2041-2070

Step 2a: Identify and assess risks - climate effects and impact

Approach and results 

Climate change poses major challenges for the forest ecosystem. In the Northern Hesse region, scientists expect warmer and wetter winters, as well as warmer and drier summers. In addition, it can be assumed that extreme events such as storms, droughts or heavy rain increasingly negatively impact the forest. It is foreseeable that pure spruce stands at many locations in North Hesse are no longer sustainable. As of today, the negative consequences of increasing drought in the summer can be seen. One reason why alternative tree species have to replace the spruce increasingly is caused by the susceptibility to windfall. The prevailing Beech in Northern Hesse can better deal with the expected changes in annual temperature and precipitation. Occasionally occurring dry phases during the growing season may compensate for the beech. However, it would be critical if extensive dry phases occur during the growing season and in successive years. There would be a risk that diseases and pests significantly affect the health of the book. Climate change can be a serious threat to the forests in Northern Hesse. Due to the slow growth of the trees, effective measures to safeguard the future of the forest are already required today.

  • Climate change is affecting the forest system. Temperature and water availability are essential for forest growth and health.
  • Stress occurs in the forest mainly due to insufficient water supply during the growing season; As a result, susceptibility to harmful events increases.
  • Damage caused by climate change can cause significant economic losses.
  • To permanently secure the forest resources for prevention measures are needed today.

Step 3: Develop and compare measures

Measures and/or strategies 

 

  • The goal of climate adaptation in the forest is the stabilization of existing forest resources and the reduction and distribution of risks.
  • The aim is to create vital, stable, diverse and adaptable forests.
  • The increase of the individual tree and stand stability, the site-specific choice of tree species, the participation of suitable hybrid tree species and the preservation of genetic diversity are essential components of the future-oriented silvicultural strategies.

Wildlife Management:

  • Multi-territorial organization beyond field forests borders is necessary.
  • Hunting strategy also takes into account habitat requirements and biology of wild animals in addition to economic interests.
  • The design of calmed grasslands allows steering pf the red deer and thus a reduction of peeling and biting damage in the forest.
  • The increase in roe deer resulting from the improved food supply must be skimmed off in order to avoid an increase in population and game damage.
  • Hunting strategies must be adapted to wild species. In red deer areas special attention must be paid to the sensitive red deer. Therefore: No night hunting in the forest allowed

Step 4: Plan and implement measures

Measures and/or strategies 

For wildlife management, a cooperation process involving stakeholder groups has been established. The participants included forest owners, hunting lessees, herding community, forestry office, lower hunting authority, hunting association and the Association of Hunting Cooperatives. The aim was to recognize the municipal interests and the forest value with the influence of climate change. Silvicultural "hot spots" were identified, which in turn resulted in adaptation measures:

  • Hunting priorities related to silvicultural Hot spots,
  • Hunting strategy (interval and focus hunting, group shooting),
  • Relief areas and resting areas for red deer incl. feeding concept
  • Disturbances of rest areas by recreation seekers
  • Hunting infrastructure (technical infrastructure and concept for the location, installation, maintenance and cost assumption of the biological infrastructure)
Legal aspects 

The Federal Hunting Act (1976) provides the framework of this report. Further concretizations can be found in the Hessian hunting law. Furthermore, the Hessian Forest Law is effective:

  • § 3 Hessian Forest Act obliges forest owners to manage their forests for the benefit of the general public and thereby obtain benefits for use, protection, climate protection and recreational effects. Along with § 4 (2) the effect of forests densities that are adapted to the forest stands and their rejuvenation.
  • § 1 Hessian hunting law calls for the compatible coexistence of land, forest and game as well as a correspondingly effective reconciliation of interests.
  • § 21 obliges the rightful hunters to practice the hunt in such a way that the essential tree species occurring in the forest can rejuvenate in accordance with the natural growth and mixing conditions of the location. Excessive biting and peeling damage should be avoided.

Step 5: Watch and evaluate adaptation (monitoring and evaluation)

Approach, objective and results of the monitoring and/or evaluation 

Timing and accountability have been defined for each policy area. In order to cover the costs of the hunting (biological) infrastructure, a decision-making basis has been developed for decision-makers. For the performance review a monitoring plan has been worked out.

Participants

Funding / Financing 

Funding provided by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety for the adaptation of climate change consequences

Project management 

CliMA – Competence Centre for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation

University of Kassel

Cooperation/Partners 

 

  • University of Kassel
  • HessenForst
  • NW-FVA

 

Share:
Article:
Printer-friendly version
Fields of action:
 woodland and forestry